logo

81 pages 2 hours read

Courtroom 302

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2005

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapter 18-EpilogueChapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 18 Summary: “Compassion”

Frank Caruso Jr. appeared in court on October 13 wearing a jail uniform that was too big for him. It was also sentencing day for Dino Titone. Additionally, there were more minor cases, such as George McNeal, a 51-year-old African American man charged with stealing $27 from a cop while offering to sell him a rabbit. McNeal had been in jail for three weeks awaiting sentencing. Judge Locallo offered him “probation, with fifty hours of community service” if he pled guilty to theft (289). 

Meanwhile, Titone hoped that Locallo would take him off death row—not because he was afraid of execution but because his parents were hurt by his death sentence. Though Titone counseled Caruso while in jail, he didn’t respect Caruso, whom he deemed “a spoiled brat living off of his father’s name and reputation” (291). He also found Caruso’s beating of Lenard Clark so reprehensible that he would have liked to give Caruso a beating himself. 

Titone’s defense lawyer argued that Titone had become wiser with age. Moreover, his responsibility for the murders was no greater than that of Robert Gacho, who had ordered the hit, or Titone’s partner, Joseph Sorrentino—both of whom had gotten life sentences. Locallo accepted the defense lawyer’s view and sentenced Titone to life in prison. 

Judge Locallo received good news in his own career when six bar groups recommended his retention as a judge. Locallo was also the only one of 11 judges to get ratings as “highly recommended” and “highly qualified” from the bar group. Deputies Rhodes and Guerrero thought it was because of how “he [kissed] up to all those attorneys” in the bar groups and because he gave contact visits (292).

As for Caruso’s sentencing, the public wanted a stern sentence, though the normal sentence “for aggravated battery [was] two to five years” (294). However, if the judge found that the crime was exceptionally heinous or brutal, then the convicted person could serve as many as 10 years. Caruso was also up for one to three years in prison for committing a hate crime. Locallo could have given Caruso the harshest possible sentence. At the other extreme, he could have given Caruso probation or boot camp, given that Caruso had “no prior convictions” (294).

Several days before sentencing, Sam Adam Jr., a young lawyer assisting Caruso’s defense attorneys, handed Judge Locallo “a packet of letters written on Caruso’s behalf” (295). The letters came from friends, relatives, public officials, community leaders, and others, and claimed that Caruso was an upstanding person who was inclined to help others. One of those who upheld the claim of Caruso’s good character was Reverend Floyd Davis, president of the Southside Branch of the NAACP. He asked Locallo to show mercy to Caruso. Later, during the sentencing hearing, Davis referred to Caruso as a “sacrificial [lamb],” which infuriated Locallo. Davis’s comment also upset his colleagues. He resigned from his NAACP post several days after the hearing. 

Herbert Martin, an African American minister from a Black community east of Bridgeport, also pled for leniency. He was the minister who led “racial healing prayer services, promoted by Caruso Senior” during the trial (301). Martin’s alliance was due to the Carusos’ power in unions, which he thought could result in more donations to his food and clothing drives and “jobs for his parishioners” (302). Martin, at the time, was the third-most powerful African American religious leader in Chicago, following Jesse Jackson and Louis Farrakhan. 

In the packet of letters, there was also one from Clark’s mother, Wanda McMurray, asking for clemency. McMurray later denied that she had written the letter, which was unsigned.

Caruso’s accomplices, Victor Jasas and Michael Kwidzinski, were set to go to trial four days after Caruso’s sentencing hearing. The prosecutors had weaker cases against these two. They worried that, if their cases went to trial, they would be acquitted. Locallo wanted to sentence Caruso quickly—not to help him keep his seat in the November 3 election, he insisted, but to give Jasas and Kwidzinski some sense of whether it would benefit them to go to trial. Bruno Caruso, meanwhile, was passing out buttons to hurt Locallo’s campaign.

During the trial, Genson read a letter from his client. Frank Jr. claimed that he had “prayed that Lenard would recover from his injuries” (304). He also wrote that, from the time that he was a boy, he had heard older Bridgeport residents express animosity toward “all outsiders,” not only Black people. They were afraid that new residents would take their jobs and their houses and bring drugs into the neighborhood. Genson read a letter from Frank Sr. that claimed his son had taken up with the wrong crowd. The elder Caruso denied that his son learned any racial hatred at home because he had “[spoken] forcefully to his children against ethnic stereotyping” (307). 

Judge Locallo blamed Frank Caruso Jr. alone for his crime and characterized the residents of Bridgeport as “hardworking and decent” (307). He also said that he believed Frank Jr.’s parents had done their best with him. Locallo sentenced Caruso to eight years, with “three concurrent years for hate crime” (307). On the following Monday, Judge Locallo dealt with the cases of Jasas and Kwidzinski, who pled guilty to battery. Jasas got 30 months of “felony probation,” while Kwidzinski got “two years’ probation” (308). Both men had to perform 300 hours of community service “in some area of racial awareness or racial sensitivity” (308). Locallo insisted that his sentencing in the Bridgeport case had nothing to do with politics. He was furious when he heard about the Carusos’ campaign against him but insisted that his personal feelings would never change the way he did things.

Chapter 19 Summary: “Politics”

Chicago’s African American community was dissatisfied with the decision in the Bridgeport case, while Frank Caruso Jr.’s lawyers asked Judge Locallo to reconsider Caruso’s case, arguing that his eight-year sentence was unfair, given that his accomplices only got probation. Wanda McMurray, Lenard Clark’s mother, agreed. Locallo set a hearing in the fall to review Caruso’s sentence.

Caruso’s father was present for the new hearing. The author took the opportunity to ask him how he would have felt if someone had beaten up Frank Jr. when he was 13, in the way that Clark had been beaten up. Frank Sr. recounted a story about “something that happened to Frank Junior when he was eleven” (314). Frank Jr. had gone skateboarding in the predominantly Black neighborhood east of Bridgeport. Three Black men drove by “and offered to tow him along” (314). The boy accepted the offer. The men towed Frank to the top of a hill, then sped up. Frank Jr. went flying then hit the pavement, head-first. At the hospital, Frank Sr. saw that his head’s son had swollen to an incredible size. Moreover, “[f]lesh was torn from Frank Junior’s face, neck, and chest” (314). Frank Sr. didn’t think at all about who the culprits were. All that mattered to him were the doctors’ assurances that Frank Jr. would recover. 

In the gallery during the hearing, Caruso supporters berated Locallo and accused him of using the Caruso case to further his political career. Frank Sr. also delivered a statement in which he contended that Locallo’s decision “[had] been clouded” by “pressure […] from politics and the media” (315). Locallo ultimately refused to reconsider Frank Jr.’s case, which resulted in ramped-up efforts within Bridgeport to unseat him. Conversely, the African American community also supported the judge’s replacement due to their outrage over Locallo’s probation sentences for Jasas and Kwidzinski. Meanwhile, Locallo’s campaign raised $21,850—most of it from criminal defense lawyers’ donations. Initially, Reverend Jesse Jackson’s PUSH Coalition planned to encourage voters to reject Locallo. However, after Locallo sought help from his mentors, Appellate Justice William Cousins and former Appellate Justice Eugene Pincham—both African American—Jackson reversed his position and agreed to support Locallo. In exchange, Locallo’s campaign committee sent $1,200 in donations to PUSH.

On Election Day, Locallo “[coasted] to retention with a 78 percent affirmative vote, well above the required 60 percent” (325). However, he lost the vote in Chicago’s 25th Ward, where he and his family lived. As for the Bridgeport case, Judge Locallo regretted that he couldn’t give Frank Jr. 10 years, but he believed that justice had been served.

Evidence in the Bridgeport case strongly suggested Victor Jasas was the second attacker, but it also suggested Kwidzinski wasn’t involved in the attack. The other witnesses hadn’t implicated him, but “anonymous tipsters” had. Worse, “the case against Kwidzinski rested solely on DeSantis,” who was dead (327). When the author reported to Detective Turner that there was a third assailant in the attack who wasn’t Kwidzinski, Turner insisted that Kwidzinski—though not as bad as the others—was still “an asshole” (330).

In April 1997, Detective Turner showed up to a grand jury hearing to indict Caruso, Jasas, and Kwidzinski “for attempted murder, aggravated battery, and hate crime” (332). While there was plenty of evidence showing that Caruso and Jasas beat Lenard and called him the n-word, there was no evidence that Kwidzinski had done any of this (332). However, Turner, who had previously testified before the grand jury, knew that he didn’t have to be so specific. 

Kwidzinski pled guilty to attempted murder and was sentenced to misdemeanor probation, due to evidence against him being rather thin. Jasas, on the other hand, got felony probation. On the morning that Kwidzinski pled guilty, he spoke briefly to the author outside of the courtroom. He said that police and prosecutors would “do anything to cover their asses” (336). When Bogira reviewed with Judge Locallo the facts in Kwidzinski’s case that suggested the young man’s innocence, Locallo expressed interest but reassured himself that Kwidzinski was guilty because he had pled guilty—overlooking the young man’s fear of going to trial and facing “a possible prison term of six to thirty years” (333).

Epilogue Summary: “A Promising Future”

In 1999, Judge Locallo was working in his chambers when two FBI agents visited and warned him that someone might have been trying to murder him. The agents ensured that Locallo got a security detail. Though high-ranking mobsters assured the FBI that they were not going after Locallo, the judge believed the death threats were tied to the sentence he gave Frank Caruso Jr. In 2000, the FBI contacted Locallo with news of more death threats. This time, Locallo only asked for a police patrol around his house. 

Richard DeSantis, the witness who disappeared during the Bridgeport trial, “surfaced in November 1998, two months after the Caruso trial finished” (337). He was charged with obstructing justice, which brought a possible sentence of one to three years. DeSantis pled guilty in exchange for a year-long sentence. Though he tried to broker for probation, the prosecutor Ellen Mandeltort—who handled the other Bridgeport cases—insisted he serve time in prison. In the end, DeSantis didn’t go to prison; instead, he spent six months at the Illinois Department of Corrections.

Mike Cutler’s murder remained unsolved, with detectives having concluded that he was killed during a robbery. The police disregarded the possibility that it was a mob hit—a denial that the Chicago Sun-Times attributed to the persistent influence of organized crime in the city.

Frank Caruso Jr. began serving his sentence at the Sheridan Correctional Center—a medium-security facility. Though Judge Locallo had sentenced Caruso to eight years, Caruso only served three years and three months due to day-for-day credit and for attending school while incarcerated. He only spent a year and a half in the penitentiary. The rest was spent at a facility in Urbana where he attended school; he then went back home. 

A front-page story in the Chicago Sun-Times, taken a day after Martin Luther King Day, featured Caruso Jr. and Lenard Clark together. The story reported that Clark had twice visited Caruso at the Sheridan facility. Locallo believed Dominic Di Frisco, a public relations executive and friend of the Carusos, had arranged the photo. In 1998, Di Frisco tried to convince Locallo to minimize Caruso’s sentence. 

In regard to Leslie McGee’s case, McGee revealed to Bogira during a phone call that she had lied in her confession. She had, in fact, been involved with Jean François for nine months and shot him because he had planned to end the relationship to focus on his wife and children. McGee was 15 when they began seeing each other. McGee had been carrying the gun, she said, to protect herself because she had been working nights as a cocktail waitress. 

The Illinois Supreme Court supported Judge Locallo’s “decision to deny Leroy Orange a hearing regarding his torture claims” (342-43). Orange’s hearing was delayed several times and then became unnecessary after Governor George Ryan “declared a moratorium on executions” in the state due to Illinois’s “shameful record of sending innocent men to death row” (343). Governor Ryan was then “indicted on federal corruption charges for allegedly steering contracts and leases to family and friends during his tenure as secretary of state” (344). Orange, however, was arrested again “near his South Side home and charged with selling crack cocaine” (344). He pled guilty and was sentenced to five years in prison. 

Dan Young Jr., the man who pled guilty to raping and murdering Kathy Morgan in 1990, was released after 13 years when the state dropped its case against him and his supposed accomplice, Harold Hill. DNA evidence exonerated both men.

Larry Bates “waited in jail for three months before a treatment bed opened for him in a south-side rehab center” (346). He worked for a while as a machinist in a factory after he got out, then married Lillie Gross, “the mother of two of his children” (347). The pressures of being unable to get a job earning more than minimum wage and seeing his drug-using friends each day, caused Bates to relapse in mid-1999. Once again, he was selling drugs to fund his habit. In early 2001, he was back at the 26th Street Courthouse, pleading guilty to “two new drug-dealing offenses” (347). He ended up in prison for seven and a half years. He was denied both work release and the chance to serve his last year at home because he was found guilty of selling drugs “within a thousand feet of a park or school” (348). After he was released in November 2004, he resumed work, taking whatever jobs he could get. Otherwise, he spent time with his children and grandchildren.

In 2002, the Cook County jail population rose “above eleven thousand” (349). The overpopulation led the sheriff to propose housing some of the population in tents. 

In March 1999, Judge Locallo was sent to a civil courtroom downtown, where he handled lucrative “personal injury and medical malpractice suits” (350). Most of the defendants were white and white-collar. For making a distasteful public joke about another judge—who he believed took too long to dispose of her cases—he was briefly shipped to a suburban court. Locallo missed his colleagues and the important work that he did on 26th Street, but he enjoyed “doing the big lawsuits in the Daley Center” (351).

Chapter 18-Epilogue Analysis

These chapters delve into Locallo’s political career and ambitions. His motives in the courtroom were met with skepticism, particularly by the deputies who served him. Here, too, Locallo reasserted his reputation for being unwaveringly on the side of law enforcement and the prosecution by dismissing clear evidence that Michael Kwidzinski—who pled guilty to battery under pressure from police—may not have been guilty after all. 

The ambitions of the local Black clergy are also displayed in these chapters, exemplified by their obsequiousness to the Caruso family. In regard to Frank Jr., Judge Locallo took a view similar to how he judged his Black defendants: He believed Caruso’s crime was an aberration from the values instilled in him by his family and his community. This view overlooks the active segregation that the citizens of Bridgeport practiced to maintain their all-white neighborhood. 

However, when Frank Sr. recalled his son’s own experience of being the victim of a hate crime, the reader cannot help but suspect that the experience spurred Frank Jr. to commit an act of revenge. In his episode, too, young men attacked a helpless boy. Frank Jr. may have attacked Lenard Clark to demonstrate his resentment toward a community that he imagined hated him as much as he had learned to hate them. 

The conclusion to Leroy Orange’s ordeal is disappointing for the same reason as that of Larry Bates’s story. Orange, like Bates, quickly became ensorcelled in the world of drug dealing again after he was freed. This reasserts the notion that drug addiction is a cyclical problem from which people have little means of escape when they live in communities replete with illegal substances.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 81 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools