50 pages • 1 hour read
Newman’s use of terrorism in her novel, while problematic, does attempt to connect macro-level failures with the micro-level ways in which individual humans experience institutional failures. Newman prompts her readers to consider what makes a terrorist, and Sam in particular has some sympathetic characteristics that complicate him somewhat beyond the flat archetype of a purely evil antagonist. At the end of the novel, Newman portrays the two terrorists as more misguided than innately cruel.
There is a tension throughout the novel between the use of humans as symbolic, passive objects and the reality of humans as autonomous beings whose lives are inherently valuable. This tension is a constant in politics, wherein politicians and those otherwise in power can become desensitized as they make decisions about huge numbers of people. Part of Sam’s frustration is in the emotional distancing of the American public from the trauma and loss that happened abroad, which he experienced on a personal level. Terrorism is the use of violence and fear to achieve political or ideological goals; this term describes the actions Sam takes against the Hoffman family in order to achieve his desired goal, that is, to force the American public to experience the pain he felt in the reduction of his own family to political pawns. Sam wants to make a statement against the President of the United States in response to the president deciding to withdraw troops from Syria with the understanding that this act would result in Turkey attacking Kurdistan, an ally of the United States. Sam’s actions, though, manifest the very callousness that he seeks to repudiate. Sam’s awareness of this paradox comes out in several ways. With more subtlety, it emerges in the brief moments where he chooses not to harm Bill’s family or offers them moments of dignity despite the circumstances he has placed them in. In a more explicit sense, it comes out in his death by suicide, which hints at the resolvability of his internal dilemma and the depth of his grief and guilt.
The novel is also interested in how wide-scale political actions can manifest in specific, individual human emotional reactions. The events that prompt the story of the novel are largely off-page, long-term historical-political conflicts; they are around a century in the making at least, and any informed discussion of them would entail a broader outline of the far-reaching consequences of the formation of the Western empire post-World War II. Newman focuses, in contrast, on individual humans in her character-driven novel. Sam feels deeply guilty that he left his family behind in Kurdistan, which meant he was in a bar flirting with American girls when the attack by Turkey took place. Sam’s survivor’s guilt complicates his profound grief. Publicly, he attempts to frame his actions as political in nature, portraying himself as no different from the detached politicians and American public who allowed the deaths of so many. Privately, his actions are an effort to displace his guilt and find a concrete target for his rage: a single American man who can embody the political entity of the United States, a concept too big and nebulous to pin down in the same way.
Newman’s portrayal of the two Kurdish terrorists, especially cast as the antagonists versus a noble white American everyman of the middle class, does help reinforce long-held prejudices about people from the Middle East. Though the term Islam never arises, and Sam and Ben insist they do not believe in jihadism, the novel nonetheless capitalizes on racist stereotypes and imagery common within post-9/11 Islamophobia and Jingoism. In the end, Newman describes Bill and his wife educating themselves about their politics and striving to make a difference. Considered in the full context of the novel, though, which centers white Americans’ perspectives and casts them as innocent victims and noble heroes, this minimally mentioned effort does not mark a substantial disruption of the status quo in the United States that vilifies and dehumanizes people from the Middle East.
Newman emphasizes the potential and significance of family and friendship through all her primary characters. Bill is immediately able to rely on Jo, his flight attendant, as the two have forged a friendship over 20 years of working together. Jo, in turn, relies on her fellow flight attendants working the flight: Jo and Big Daddy have worked together for years, and Kellie proves herself a worthy member of their team as they navigate the crisis. Jo also benefits from her strong relationships with her family on the ground. Theo is her nephew, and he grew up so close to her family that he feels a strong sense of brotherhood with his aunt and uncle. This strength of his family connection drives Theo to put his career at risk on nothing more than his aunt’s word. Taken together, and coupled with the nature of the crisis, which centers on a kidnapped family, these relationships indicate Newman’s interest in how strong human bonds enable people to overcome profound challenges.
At the same time, the novel acknowledges the vulnerability inherent in forming strong relationships. Bill’s love for his family is what gives Sam and Ben their initial opening to attempt to manipulate him into crashing the plane. Bill’s flashbacks repeatedly mark the depth of his love for his wife and their children, raising the stakes in turn, as these flashbacks emphasize how much Bill would suffer if his family were to die. Sam’s loss of his family and his related actions, in turn, interact with Bill’s flashbacks to amplify this effect.
Sam helped raise his siblings, including his little brother, who he raised from infancy; his bond with his little brother was especially strong. Therefore, when Sam chose to move to the United States and learned a short time later that his little brother was killed trying to protect his mother, Sam’s grief was profound—enough to prompt Sam to kidnap Bill’s family and thereby hijack a plane with the aim of killing thousands more. Strong relationships are thus powerful in multiple senses: whether stable or suddenly lost, they can inspire dramatic action.
Newman juxtaposes her antagonists, who are striving to kill others in order to make an ideological point, with her heroes, who are willing to sacrifice on a personal level in order to protect human life. Sam, and later Ben, operate on the premise that they have nothing left to lose. Their goal, in turn, is to transform “souls” into political pawns to make a statement about American indifference. In contrast, the characters who combat Sam and Ben prioritize the safety and lives of potential victims over their own well-being.
Bill is the clearest depiction of what Newman portrays as an ideal leader. Bill is the pilot of the commercial aircraft, the main setting of the novel. Bill takes his responsibilities seriously, as established early on with the nightmare he experiences in the prologue. Throughout the novel, Bill takes decisive actions, driving the plot forward with his choices. He even assigns leadership roles to others, making clear to Jo that she is in charge of the passenger cabin. Bill does all this while standing to lose the most if he refuses Sam’s instructions. Later, Bill places himself in danger by initiating a Morse code connection with air traffic control; this last act also shows Bill’s willingness to sacrifice himself as he is aware that if Sam learns what he is doing, Sam could initiate an attack from his accomplice on board the plane. Bill’s willingness to sacrifice himself is evident again in his attack against Ben even though Ben has a gun.
Side characters also suggest that willingness to sacrifice is inextricable from leadership skills. Like Bill, Jo is proactive, and her actions help drive the plot forward. Jo decides to announce via the news what is happening on the plane. She also neutralizes the gas canister, which entails sacrificing herself in order to capture it, an act that results in a physical confrontation with a passenger. Similar traits emerge in Big Daddy when he jumps into the fray to capture the second gas canister. Theo’s leadership qualities come out when he conceives the plan to place Carrie in front of news cameras to make a plea to the president. In turn, Theo’s willingness to sacrifice is clear when he goes to his supervisor regarding the hijacking despite knowing that his recent disciplinary issues place him in a precarious position. Theo then consistently demonstrates this willingness throughout the hunt for the Hoffman family, particularly when he is caught up in an explosion and a car accident.
Altogether, the resulting image of an ideal leader generated in the novel fits the traditional image of an American hero. That is, in the novel, a leader is a highly individualistic actor, someone capable of taking charge and operating fluidly under high pressure. Perhaps most importantly, a leader is someone willing to put themselves on the line for the sake of protecting those weaker or more vulnerable than themselves.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: