59 pages • 1 hour read
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Ghosts of Honolulu: A Japanese Spy, A Japanese-American Spy Hunter, and the Untold Story of Pearl Harbor asks the question of whether one’s identity is derived more from one’s nationalism or one’s ethnicity and which deserves loyalty when these two aspects of self are forced into conflict with one another. Indeed, for second-generation Americans the question of identity is a puzzling one that often leads to conflict either with their preceding generation or their adopted culture.
To understand the role of the American Nisei in Hawaii during the lead up to war with their ancestral homeland Japan, it is vital to understand how the Nisei self-identified at the time and why this identification was at the core of the argument that the Nisei posed no risk to national security. According to psychologist Beverly Tatum,
The concept of identity is a complex one, shaped by individual characteristics, family dynamics, historical factors, and social and political contexts. Who am I? The answer depends in large part on who the world around me says I am. Who do my parents say I am? Who do my peers say I am? What message is reflected back to me in the faces and voices of my teachers, my neighbors, store clerks? What do I learn from the media about myself? (Beverly, Daniel Tatum. “The Complexity of Identity: ‘Who Am I?’” Readings for Diversity and Social Justice, edited by Adams et al., Routledge, 2000, p. 9).
For the Nisei in Hawaii, the question of identity was a perplexing one. Their parents, the Issei, were largely a traditionalist group who adhered to the customs, religion, and language of Japan. The Issei often encouraged or forced their children to return to Japan so they would not lose all connection with their culture. This is what led Douglas Wada’s parents to enroll him in Japanese language classes at West Hongwanji and to send him to Japan in 1928 when they sensed he was overly Americanized and floundering as graduation loomed.
For the Nisei, the identity derived from “who do my parents say I am” was in contrast to their perception of their identity in the context of “who do my peers say I am?” (Tatum 9). In Ghosts of Honolulu: A Japanese Spy, A Japanese-American Spy Hunter, and the Untold Story of Pearl Harbor, the authors assert that McKinley “Tokyo” High was “more responsible for the Americanization of the Japanese Hawaiians than any other institution besides the city’s movie theaters” (79). Students played American sports, enjoyed American movies, used American slang, and built their peer-to-peer identities around this hub of westernization. At school, Douglas Wada was a different version of himself than he was with his Issei parents on Kama Lane.
According to Tatum, how the people around someone react to them impacts that person’s identity. The Nisei had a false identity reflected back at them in the media and among their fellow US citizens in the buildup to war with Japan. En masse, they were labelled sympathizers with Japan’s militaristic expansionism, and fears of fifth columnists and saboteurs among the Japanese population were rampant. From their fellow countrymen, they were given an affiliation with a Japan many did not know or recognize. To combat this false narrative, many Nisei enlisted in the armed forces, police, or civilian organizations that supported the American war effort. Even after being betrayed and abandoned by their nation, many Nisei enlisted from the concentration camps, determined to serve their country.
The narrative nonfiction book Ghosts of Honolulu: A Japanese Spy, A Japanese-American Spy Hunter, and the Untold Story of Pearl Harbor follows the contributions of two spies to their nations amid the backdrop of WWII. Unlike fictional military and espionage thrillers, the book does not sensationalize the battle between these two spies, who in fact never meet or interact with one another except in paper trails. Unlike the fiction world, this book does not end with justice. Many of the villains of WWII survive the war to live out their lives without every facing repercussions for their heinous deeds. Such is the case with the majority of the spies introduced in Ghosts of Honolulu: A Japanese Spy, A Japanese-American Spy Hunter, and the Untold Story of Pearl Harbor. The book explores these miscarriages of justice, ultimately highlighting how those behind the attack on Pearl Harbor escaped justice while many innocent Japanese Americans were incarcerated without due cause or due process.
Douglas Wada labors in US naval intelligence as the only Japanese American interpreter and spy. Throughout the buildup to war and during WWII, Wada helps the US navy monitor his Japanese American community, hoping his work will reveal that the majority of Nisei in Hawaii are loyal to the United States and pose no threat. The real danger to America is not from within, but an external threat based out of the Japanese consulate. Wada understands that while it is unjust for the Nisei to be labelled as Japanese collaborators without evidence, he must also strive to collect a preponderance of evidence against the real spies at the Japanese consulate. Once they succeed, the Roosevelt administration refuses their request to arrest or expel the staff of the consulate. When the facts were not present, judgement against the Nisei was levied. When the evidence of espionage in the Japanese consulate was proven, no action was taken against the spies. For Wada, justice soon became an imaginary thing.
The other spy in Ghosts of Honolulu: A Japanese Spy, A Japanese-American Spy Hunter, and the Untold Story of Pearl Harbor is a low-ranking Japanese former naval ensign named Takeo Yoshikawa, now under diplomatic cover at the Japanese consulate in Hawaii. His role is to map and monitor the US naval fleet. Yoshikawa goes about his work in Hawaii with little fear of being caught or of reprisal. He hardly hides his actions as he frequents tea houses with views of the harbor and drives and walks around Hawaii taking photos and notes. His drivers quickly figure out his goals and assist. He does little to conceal his work or his presence. When the consulate is arrested en masse after the December 7 attack on Pearl Harbor, Yoshikawa’s alias remains intact, and although he is labelled a spy and officials uncover his role, his identity is safe and he is exchanged along with his handler consul-general Kita for American prisoners. Yoshimoto is never charged and faces no retribution for his role in providing invaluable intelligence to the Japanese Imperial Navy. After returning to Japan, Yoshikawa acts as an interrogator in a unit known to torture and kill captured Allied forces. Though Douglas Wada looks for Yoshikawa while in Japan after the war, he is unsuccessful, and the Japanese spy responsible for Pearl Harbor survives the era of post-war tribunals hiding under another alias.
Yoshikawa’s driver, Richard Kotoshirodo, who assists with photography, surveillance, and mapping, is never prosecuted: “He confessed his involvement in Pearl Harbor to the FBI and an internee hearing board. Yet, he’s never been charged with any crime, even after much investigation and deliberation by the military investigators and the FBI” (207). When Kotoshirodo reappears in Hawaii in 1948, Douglas Wada files a report that leads nowhere, and Kotoshirodo lives out his life in Hawaii without repercussions for his brazen acts of espionage against the United States.
While in Japan, Douglas Wada learns of the scope of the tribunal’s prosecution, which will not include Minoru Genda, the officer who helped plan and launch the attack on Pearl Harbor from the Akagi. He avoided punishment in the military tribunal and went on to lead in Japan’s Self Defense Force before running for political office as a far-right candidate and winning, holding office for many years. He fought against nuclear non-proliferation in Japan, and asserted that Japan would have used nuclear weapons during WWII if they could have. He avoided all responsibility for the attack that left over 2,000 Americans dead and brought the US into WWII.
Japan’s Emperor Hirohito does not abdicate the throne after Japan’s defeat and is not tried. He escapes all connection to the war tribunals, war crimes, and Japan’s expansionism at large. He serves as Emperor for 62 years, the longest reigning Japanese monarch in history.
The book highlights the failures of the intelligence services in the pre-WWII era, taking care not to undermine the contributions of the men and women who worked in the intelligence field at the time. The authors’ aim is to shed light on the unsung heroes of the precursor to the NCIS. They maintain this careful balance throughout the book, even as critical pivot points are revealed.
According to the US Defense Technical Information Center,
Many scholars and writers state that the surprise the Japanese achieved in their attack on Pearl Harbor resulted from a failure of the U.S. intelligence community to provide adequate, accurate information to government and military decision-makers (Piacine, Robert F. “Pearl Harbor: Failure of Intelligence?” DTIC, 1 Mar. 1997).
The study of history offers the gift of hindsight, granting historians the ability to search for pivot points that could have altered the course of events. Ghosts of Honolulu: A Japanese Spy, A Japanese-American Spy Hunter, and the Untold Story of Pearl Harbor highlights the many times intelligence was within reach but lost, as well as the many times intelligence was held by one agency but not shared. The book also features instances when coordination between intelligence groups would have prevented overlap, waste, and missed opportunities. These revelations help paint the picture of an uncoordinated, misdirected intelligence effort on the eve of America’s participation in WWII. Nevertheless, the book underscores that, amid the chaos, many good men and women worked tirelessly, often blindfolded and without the appropriate assets, in the aim of safeguarding the United States.
Authors Mark Harmon and Leon Carroll demonstrate how events in one period of time directly relate to the coming attack on Pearl Harbor. This occurs so frequently in the text that it takes on thematic value as the number of slight alterations to events that could have prevented the fateful attack are stacked atop one another. These pivot points represent failures and flaws in the intelligence community’s design, coordination, and utilization. The authors focus not on the structural and organizational flaws, but on individuals within the machine of intelligence collection, bringing attention to the unsung heroes even as they steered a flawed and sinking ship.
Many of these shortcomings were addressed in the wake of September 11, 2001, with the creation of the Department of Homeland Security (2002) and the Director of National Intelligence (2004).
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: