logo

54 pages 1 hour read

Pompeii: A Novel

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2003

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Tensions Between Fate and Agency

Fate and Agency play an important role in Pompeii. Attilius feels beholden to fate. As the latest in a long line of engineers, he feels that working on the aqueducts of the Roman Empire is his calling. He is fated to be an engineer, just as his father and his grandfather were before him. Similarly, he has suffered negatively at the hands of fate. The deaths of his wife and child have caused him to reject religion and politics, but he cannot give up on the idea of fate. His conception of fate is a demonstration of his desire for agency. Without religion or politics to guide him, he throws himself on the mercy of fate and embraces his destiny to be an engineer. Attilius treats his chosen profession almost like a religion because it gives him a sense of agency and control. By learning the rules of engineering, he can predict the way the world works. A thorough knowledge of the aqueduct system—an essential part of everyday life in the Roman Empire—allows him to assert agency over his life and the lives of others. Engineering provides Attilius with a very clear, very reliable set of rules for the way the world works. By learning and adhering to these rules, he can regain the sense of control that he lost following the deaths of his wife and child.

When natural disasters occur, the general population portrayed in Pompeii declare that they are being punished by the gods. The earthquake, the loss of water, and the eruption of Mount Vesuvius are all declared to be divine retribution against a corrupt and decadent society. For the audience, this is evidently untrue. The use of passages from scientific papers and textbooks as the epigraphs for each chapter creates dramatic irony, in which the audience is given a very clear, scientific explanation for the natural disasters which is not available to the characters in the novel. The characters lack agency because they lack the scientific knowledge of what makes volcanoes erupt. Since they lack this knowledge, they grope about for any explanation for what is happening to them and why it is happening. They give themselves up to fate, surrendering their agency by assigning the naturally-occurring events to the gods. Their lack of agency and lack of knowledge leaves them with no choice but to be victims of fate and circumstance.

Ampliatus tries to assert agency over his fate and the fate of Pompeii. He commissions a prophecy, in which an oracle tells him that—far in the future— Pompeii will be a bustling place with people from many nations. Ampliatus chooses to believe that this prophecy bodes well for the city, certain that Pompeii will become a flourishing trade destination for centuries to come. Again, dramatic irony means that the audience knows Ampliatus is incorrect: Pompeii is a bustling place due to the many tourists and archeologists who are visiting the destroyed city. Ampliatus's attempts to assert agency over his fate are built on shaky foundations; the prophecy is little more than a Rorschach test, vague enough to allow a person to project their chosen fate onto the words and believe whatever they want to believe. The prophecy proves ultimately correct, suggesting that fate is real, but the vagueness of the words illustrates the inherent danger of trying to assert agency over such a chaotic, unpredictable force such as fate.

The Hollowness of Roman Identity

As citizens of the Roman Empire, many of the characters are aware of the concept of a distinct Roman identity. To the characters, there exists a hypothetical, abstract “Roman” ideal which acts as a yardstick by which they can measure their own behavior. This identity is constructed through history and an idealized interpretation of Roman society: for men like Attilius, a true Roman is one who works diligently as part of a team, sacrificing individual glory to come together and build something quickly, efficiently, and effectively. When his team of workmen repairs the aqueduct, for example, he is proud of them for working in a Roman way. Pliny makes similar comments. When he is about to die, he chooses to stand up and face his fate. His stoic acceptance of his death is, to him, a Roman way to die.

The Roman identity incorporates many traits which are regarded as positive in society: strength, stoicism, honor, teamwork, and integrity are all cornerstones of what the characters believe to be the attributes of a true Roman citizen. They construct this identity subconsciously, measuring their own actions against this ideal and declaring certain (typically successful and positive) acts as being truly Roman. As such, the characters are in constant communication with their interpretation of Roman identity. As Roman citizens, they judge every act not only on moral outcomes or direct consequences, but on the degree to which it bolsters their Roman identity. Being a Roman is very important to these characters, so anything which bolsters said identity is welcomed.

The problem with Roman identity is that, as illustrated in the novel, the idealized, hypothetical Roman is a fleeting, unattainable reality. Characters may congratulate themselves whenever they perceive their actions to adhere to the ideal Roman identity but, more often than not, they fail to adhere to these standards. For every Pliny, stoically standing on the beach and accepting his fate, there are thousands of Roman citizens fleeing in the opposite direction. For every man on Attilius's team who works hard for the betterment of the Empire, there is someone like Corax or Ampliatus who is willing to undermine his efforts for personal gain. When events take a turn for the worst, the characters abandon their desire to reach these high standards. As Mount Vesuvius erupts, Roman identity is revealed to be a fragile, impossible index by which to judge individuals.

The hollowness of stated Roman identity reveals a secondary layer to this theme. If only a few characters ever measure up to the explicit Roman identity, the actions of the vast majority reveal the true, hidden Roman identity. The real Roman citizen, as portrayed in the novel, is a corrupt aristocrat. The magistrates are decadent, morally bankrupt, and weak. Ampliatus, Exomnius, and Corax are self-interested and corrupt. These men are in the majority in the novel, providing a far more accurate archetype with which to define Roman identity. While the idealized Roman identity is strong, stoic, and moral, the true Roman identity is corrupt, weak, and morally bankrupt. In this sense, Roman identity becomes a useful tool for hiding the rot at the heart of society. By describing a set of standards as the Roman ideal, society is able to distract its citizens from the true corruption and moral decay that defines the Roman society of the era.

Modern Attitudes in a Classical World

Pompeii is a novel set 2,000 years in the past. Despite the meticulous portrayal of life in the Roman Empire, modern attitudes are evident throughout. Attilius lives in the classical world but many of his personality traits and beliefs are decidedly modern. Due to the trauma incurred by the loss of his wife and child, he rejects religion. To all intents and purposes, Attilius is an atheist who refuses to acknowledge the existence of the gods which every other character takes for granted. Instead of religion, Attilius relies on engineering and science to provide him with guidance in his life. He substitutes science for religion, a modern ethos which feels anachronistic in a classical world. Attilius's modern sensibilities distinguish him from the other characters and form the foundation of his success. His refusal to accept religious or superstitious explanations for strange occurrences in the world helps him to uncover the problems in the water supply and to predict the imminent eruption of the volcano. As a modern man, Attilius's perspective makes him unique in the classical world and elevates him above the corrupt and delusional population.

Attilius is not alone in his modern sensibilities. Corelia is similarly discordant, attempting to assert her agency despite the patriarchal nature of a society which marginalizes her gender. The society portrayed in Pompeii is inherently patriarchal. Men occupy every position of power and women are relegated to the role of housekeeper or wife. Other than slaves and prostitutes, women are rarely permitted to have jobs or vocations. Ampliatus loves his daughter, but he uses Corelia as a pawn in his corrupt games, promising to marry her to Popidius for his own personal gain, even though she loathes the old magistrate.

Corelia rebels against her father, against his corruption, and against the patriarchal society which marginalizes women such as her. After trying to save the life of a slave by recruiting Attilius, she then steals the documents which prove her father's corruption and tries to share them with the world. Her feminist act of rebellion is a modern expression of a desire for equality, but it clashes with the values of the classical world. As Attilius explains to Corelia, justice remains out of her reach: The corrupt, patriarchal society will inherently side with her father. The institutions of the patriarchy are too powerful to be challenged by an individual. Corelia does not succeed in her quest for justice, but her sensibilities remain modern and unite her with Attilius. Together, they are a modern challenge to the classical world as portrayed in the novel.

Pliny plays a unique role in relation to the theme of modern attitudes in a classical world. As a real-life figure, he is a representative of the classical world. His works and his reputation have endured in the centuries since his death. The character of Pliny as portrayed in the novel, however, is a modern creation. Pliny is an example of modern attitudes projected onto a classical figure; his earnest scientific rigor and his respect for Attilius are fictional inventions, blending together the known facts about Pliny while having him interact with Attilius, a representative of modern attitudes. Pliny's respect for Attilius is a merger between the modern and the classical, suggesting that respect for the sciences may transcend time periods. By including an authentic historical figure and imbuing him with a respect for the modern man, the novel is able to reach out across the chronological and ideological divides between the modern and classical worlds. As such, Pliny is the synthesis of the classical thesis and the modern antithesis: He is the bridge between two worlds.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 54 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools