41 pages • 1 hour read
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Part 3 begins by introducing a few central beliefs that inform historical materialism. One of Marx’s theories, historical materialism is the idea that social and political change throughout history is largely the result of economic conditions and changes to how goods are produced and traded. In this framework, “the final causes of all social changes and political revolutions are to be sought, not in men’s brains, not in men’s better insights into eternal truth and justice, but in changes in the modes of production and exchange” (63). Therefore, the way society orders itself depends upon its class structure and division of wealth.
Engels reiterates the Marxist position on the birth of capitalism: Capitalism overtook feudalism, and handicraft gave way to modern industry. Likewise, he asserts that there is a conflict in modern capitalism and its modes of production—namely, that modern productive forces have “outgrown” the capitalist system. He also argues that this fact can be demonstrated objectively.
Engels returns to the three-tier model of phases of production, this time emphasizing its effect on the “social means of production” (65). He argues that, over time, production shifted from individuals with crafting expertise creating various means of sustenance (handicraft) to groups of laborers operating industrial machines that create goods solely for profit (modern industry).
Under the conditions of modern industry, each worker participates in the creation of articles, but none of them can claim ownership of them. By contrast, workers in the handicraft period typically owned the means of production (e.g., looms, wool, cloth, dye, etc.), but workers in the modern industrial period did not. Engels writes,
Now, the owner of the instruments of labor always appropriated to himself the product, although it was no longer his product but exclusively the product of the labor of others. Thus, the products now produced socially were not appropriated by those who had actually set in motion the means of production and actually produced the commodities, but by the capitalists (67).
Engels asserts that this contradiction is at the heart of class antagonism under capitalism. He quotes Marx in asserting that as wealth accumulates among the privileged few, misery accumulates among everyone else.
The author also discusses the untold levels of violence that erupted as capitalism transformed handicraft into manufacturing. Wars were fought both between nations over land and resources, and between individual capitalists in a “Darwinian struggle” which led to “intensified violence.”
Engels concludes by dividing human history up into three basic categories: the medieval period, the capitalist revolution, and the proletarian revolution. He predicts that the capitalist period of European history is ending and will shortly give way to the proletarian revolution. He describes capitalist production as a “vicious circle” and advocates for this revolution, which he expects will result in the dissolution of the state and social classes.
Socialism: Utopian and Scientific is as much an argument for Marxism as a science as it is an argument for Marxism in general. While Engels’s work is foundational to the social sciences (specifically economics), his vision of socialism is not regarded as a natural science in modern mainstream academia. Still, a successful argument for socialism as a science would have elevated it from an ideology to a field of study.
As if gesturing to the assertion that socialism is a natural science, Engels frequently employs scientific imagery in his argumentation throughout this work: "And to expect any other division of the products from the capitalist mode of production is the same as expecting the electrodes of a battery not to decompose acidulated water, not to liberate oxygen at the positive, hydrogen at the negative pole, so long as they are connected with the battery" (72). Elsewhere, he writes, "[T]he movement [of capitalism] becomes more and more a spiral, and must come to an end, like the movement of planets, by collision with the centre" (70). Using the aesthetics of science in his rhetoric helps Engels to emphasize his argument for socialism as a science.
Part III is essentially a rephrasing of the arguments Marx made in Capital, and Engels even quotes that book at length in this section. The power of these arguments, however, is strengthened by the inclusion of the first two sections. Engels first introduces the roots of socialist thought and its shortcomings; in short, the utopians presented socialist visions rooted not in reality but in lofty—but perhaps unattainable—human ideals. He then discusses how those shortcomings may be addressed in part by the Hegelian framework, which acknowledges the fluidity and interconnectedness of natural, social, and economic phenomena. Finally, in applying this framework to history, Engels empirically justifies Marx’s view that social evolution has been—and will continue to be—driven by class struggle, economic conditions, and the changing modes of production.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Friedrich Engels