40 pages • 1 hour read
Throughout The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Weber traces the development of the notion of a “vocational calling.” The idea of having a calling, or a specific career, has become central to modern-day capitalist society. Such a phrase suggests that one’s identity and one’s work are closely intertwined, as if one is uniquely suited to performing one’s job. Weber argues that this notion of the calling traces its origins to the Protestant Reformation and the writings of Martin Luther. In so doing, he argues that our contemporary secular attitudes toward work and career have been deeply molded by Protestant religious ideas.
Weber begins his analysis of Protestantism’s approach to work in Chapter 3, where he discusses Luther’s notion of the vocational calling. According to Weber, prior to Luther’s usage of the term “calling,” “there had been no trace of this expression earlier, either in secularized literature or in sermons” (39). Luther’s conception of the calling was deeply connected to his notion of what Weber calls “this-worldly work” (40). Luther’s teachings emphasized that Christians could have a direct, individual relationship with God and find spirituality and holiness in their day-to-day life. In turn, Luther elevated the notion of work so that it was no longer simply a task that one did to sustain oneself, but rather one of the chief ways to fulfill God’s divine will. Luther ultimately turned work in a vocational calling into an ethical and religious duty for each believer, presenting it as “a special command of God to that person” (43).
However, Luther’s notion of the calling was in some ways antithetical to how it is understood within capitalism, as Luther did not believe that an individual should seek to change their calling or their social position in life. In Chapter 4, Weber shifts to discuss “ascetic Protestantism,” such as Calvinism. Calvinist preachers saw within the notion of a vocational calling a chance to quell believers’ anxiety stemming from the Calvinist doctrine of predestination. Believers were advised to devote themselves ceaselessly to their work so as to gain certainty that they had been chosen by God for eternal salvation. Later Protestant preachers, such as the Puritan theologian Richard Baxter, further developed this notion of the calling. While Baxter saw work as an ethical good, he was critical of “the resting upon one’s possessions and the enjoyment of wealth” (104). Such teachings ultimately formed a moral ethic in which believers sought to work and earn as much money as possible, all while leading an ascetic lifestyle in which one refrains from spending one’s wealth or living off of it.
The concept of the “spirit of capitalism” is central to Weber’s analysis of the relation between Protestantism and the growth of capitalism. The spirit of capitalism is a concept Weber coined and refers to a set of attitudes and beliefs toward work and labor that Weber sees as being central to capitalist society. For Weber, the spirit of capitalism is not “a singular entity,” but rather “a complex of relationships” within Western society that can only be drawn out by the analysis of the historian (13).
To identify the spirit of capitalism, Weber begins with a long excerpt by Benjamin Franklin that Weber sees as containing the spirit of capitalism “in near classical purity” (14). In the excerpt, Benjamin Franklin offers advice to individuals on how to become rich, telling them “that time is money” and advising them to devote themselves fully to earning wealth (14). Weber argues that Franklin’s advice epitomizes the spirit of capitalism as it is “an ethically-oriented maxim for the organization of life” (16). Earning of wealth becomes seen as an ethical duty, with individuals who squander their wealth or any opportunities to earn more money being seen as untrustworthy and morally suspect.
Weber sees the spirit of capitalism as crucial for capitalism’s growth and historical development. According to Weber, there is nothing natural about the spirit of capitalism, and it would have been seen “as an expression of filthy greed and completely undignified character” in pre-capitalist societies (20). Before capitalism, most individuals sought to earn only enough money as was necessary to live “as they have been accustomed” and sustain this lifestyle (23)—an attitude that Weber calls economic traditionalism. Such economic traditionalism was often a hindrance to capitalist growth, as workers were reluctant to succumb to the demands of their capitalist employers and work harder. As such, it was necessary for the spirit of capitalism to become the dominant work ethic in society—a shift in “frame of mind” that could only have been achieved through “a long and continuous process of education and socialization” (24). Weber later argues that the Protestant Reformation served as one of the key causes of this change in attitude, helping to socialize people to become amenable to the capitalist work ethic and in turn allowing for capitalism’s unfettered growth.
Throughout The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Weber largely refrains from making any outright critiques of capitalism’s attitudes and work ethic. Instead, he attempts to remain a neutral historian, investigating how Protestantism’s concept of the vocational calling helped to form the modern-day spirit of capitalism without making any value judgments about these doctrines. However, in the final chapter, Weber begins to address how the spirit of capitalism affects modern-day individuals.
Though the spirit of capitalism originates in ascetic Protestantism and its notion of the duty to have a vocational calling, Weber argues that it became secularized and detached from its religious origins as capitalism spread throughout society. As the Protestant work ethic “helped to construct the powerful cosmos of the modern economic order,” it now influences and shapes the lives of “all individuals born into [capitalism]” (123). For Weber, the problem with this situation is that individuals are no longer allowed a choice of whether they want to follow a Protestant work ethic. As he writes: “The Puritan wanted to be a person with a vocational calling; today we are forced to be” (123).
For Weber, an issue with the spirit of capitalism is that it has transformed a voluntary religious practice into a societal ethic that people must ascribe to if they hope to survive within a capitalist system. As such, Protestantism’s dual ethic of ascetic avoidance of pleasure and tireless work has formed “a steel-hard casing” that ensnares all individuals (123). Weber portrays us as being bound to material possessions, striving to accumulate as much of them as we can all while avoiding any enjoyment of these goods. Weber also critiques how capitalism’s division of labor, which has led to an emphasis on “specialized work,” has led to a limiting of human potential (123). According to Weber, such an emphasis on specialization leads us to neglect the “multi-dimensionality of the human species” (123), as we focus on only using one aspect of our skills and personality. Though Weber is pessimistic about capitalism’s “steel-hard casing,” he ends by suggesting that one day there might be “entirely new prophets or a mighty rebirth of ancient ideas” (124), causing another transformation in society as the Protestants did.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: